Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Deep Sleeper's avatar

I have mixed views on this. It seems like an obviously positive incentive and I'm sure that it will have that effect in the short term for many people. But like most government programs, it seeks to address the aftereffects of the problem by throwing money at it, while ignoring the root cause(s). In other words, it's a band-aid reaction. The real solution, of course, is to address the underlying causes of why the price of so many things, essential to life in a modern society, have increased in relation to wages. Taking this approach, would more effectively address the cost of having, raising, and educating children. In addition, it would not increase the national debt due to fewer tax revenues. At the very least, we should take the approach that these and other tax breaks that benefit ordinary people will come from increasing the taxes on the 1 percent. Call it wealth redistribution, socialism, or whatever, but own it.

No posts

Ready for more?